VynarisEarly beta Kimi K3Get your API key

Evals & quality

56 plain-English definitions.

adversarial testing (LLM)
Deliberately crafting difficult or malicious inputs to probe a model's weaknesses or safety boundaries.
AgentBench
A benchmark suite that evaluates LLM agents across diverse interactive environments like web browsing, coding, and games.
answer relevance
A RAG/eval metric measuring whether a generated response actually addresses the question asked.
ARC-AGI
A benchmark designed to test general fluid reasoning and abstraction in a way that resists memorization, used as a proxy for progress toward AGI.
benchmark contamination
When a model's training data accidentally includes benchmark test questions, inflating its measured performance.
canary testing (model updates)
Running a small subset of traffic against a new model version to catch quality regressions before a full rollout.
Chatbot Arena
A crowdsourced platform where users compare anonymous model outputs head-to-head to generate Elo-style leaderboard rankings.
confidence calibration
How well a model's stated confidence in an answer matches its actual likelihood of being correct.
content moderation (LLM)
Automated filtering of model inputs and outputs for harmful, unsafe, or policy-violating content.
context precision
A RAG evaluation metric measuring how much of the retrieved context was actually relevant to answering the query.
context recall
A RAG evaluation metric measuring whether all necessary information needed to answer the query was present in the retrieved context.
Elo rating (LLM)
A ranking system (borrowed from chess) used to rank models based on head-to-head human or model preference votes.
eval drift
When an evaluation benchmark's relevance or discriminating power degrades over time as models improve or overfit to it.
eval harness
The tooling infrastructure that runs a model against a benchmark or test suite and scores its outputs automatically.
eval-driven development
Building and iterating on LLM applications by writing evaluation tests first, similar to test-driven development in traditional software.
evals
Structured tests used to measure and compare how well LLMs perform on specific tasks, capabilities, or safety criteria.
factuality
The extent to which a model's claims are objectively true and verifiable.
faithfulness (RAG)
A metric assessing whether a RAG system's generated answer accurately reflects the content of its retrieved source documents.
false refusal rate
The measured frequency at which a model incorrectly refuses to answer safe, legitimate requests.
golden dataset
A curated, high-quality set of input-output examples used as ground truth for evaluating model or pipeline performance.
GPQA
A graduate-level benchmark (Google-Proof Q&A) of hard science questions designed to resist simple web lookup.
groundedness
The degree to which a model's output is actually supported by the retrieved or provided source context, rather than invented.
guardrails (output validation)
Automated checks that validate or filter an LLM's output before it reaches the end user, catching unsafe or malformed responses.
hallucination
When a model generates plausible-sounding but factually incorrect or fabricated information.
hallucination rate
The measured frequency at which a model produces factually incorrect or unsupported claims on a given evaluation set.
HumanEval
A benchmark measuring a model's ability to generate correct code from natural-language programming problem descriptions.
inter-rater reliability
A statistical measure of how consistently different human evaluators agree when scoring the same model outputs.
LLM benchmark
A standardized dataset and scoring methodology used to compare model capabilities across providers.
LLM observability
Tooling that logs, traces, and monitors LLM application behavior in production, including prompts, responses, latency, and cost.
LLM-as-judge
Using a strong LLM to automatically score or compare the quality of other models' outputs instead of relying solely on human raters.
MMLU
A widely cited benchmark (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) testing model knowledge across dozens of academic subjects.
model drift
Gradual degradation or change in a model's output quality or behavior over time, often due to upstream provider updates.
offline evals
Evaluations run against a fixed, pre-collected dataset rather than on live production traffic.
online evals
Evaluations run continuously against live production traffic to monitor real-world model quality.
over-refusal
When a model unnecessarily declines to answer a benign request due to overly cautious safety training.
pairwise comparison (evals)
An evaluation method where a judge (human or model) picks the better of two candidate responses rather than scoring each in isolation.
pass@k
A code-generation evaluation metric measuring the probability that at least one of k sampled model outputs passes a correctness test.
PII detection
Automatically identifying personally identifiable information in text, used to redact sensitive data before or after LLM processing.
prompt regression
A drop in output quality caused by an unintended side effect of editing a prompt.
prompt versioning
Tracking and managing changes to prompts over time like code, so teams can test, compare, and roll back prompt versions.
refusal rate
The percentage of requests a model declines to answer, tracked as both a safety and usability metric.
regression testing (LLM)
Re-running an evaluation suite after a prompt, model, or pipeline change to catch quality drops before shipping.
response quality scoring
Automated or human-assigned scores rating how good an LLM's output is against defined criteria.
saturation (benchmark)
When most top models score near-perfectly on a benchmark, making it no longer useful for distinguishing capability differences.
self-consistency check
Verifying an answer's reliability by sampling it multiple times and checking whether the model converges on the same result.
silent model degradation
Unannounced changes to a hosted model's weights or serving stack that cause quality shifts users don't expect.
snapshot testing (LLM)
Comparing a model or prompt's current output against a previously saved "known good" output to catch unintended changes.
SWE-bench
A benchmark that tests whether an AI coding agent can resolve real-world GitHub issues in actual software repositories.
sycophancy
A model's tendency to agree with or flatter the user's stated opinion rather than giving an independently accurate answer.
sycophancy benchmark
An evaluation set specifically designed to measure how often a model changes a correct answer to agree with user pushback.
task success rate
The percentage of times an agent or model completes an assigned task correctly, a core agent evaluation metric.
toxicity classifier
A model or tool that scores text for harmful, offensive, or abusive content, often used to filter LLM inputs or outputs.
tracing (LLM)
Recording the full sequence of calls, tool invocations, and intermediate steps in an LLM application run for debugging and analysis.
trajectory evaluation
Assessing the full sequence of steps an agent took to complete a task, not just its final output.
uncertainty estimation
Techniques for measuring how confident a model is in its own output, used to trigger fallback or human review.
win rate (model comparison)
The percentage of head-to-head comparisons in which one model's output is preferred over another's.